MAD Computation Step 1: Find the Mean
Team B data: 150, 152, 155, 158, 160, 162, 163, 165, 167, 170
The mean is our reference point — each deviation is measured from 160.2.
MAD Step 2: Compute Absolute Deviations
| Value |
|-------|-------------|---------------|
| 150 | −10.2 | 10.2 |
| 152 | −8.2 | 8.2 |
| 155 | −5.2 | 5.2 |
| 158 | −2.2 | 2.2 |
| 160 | −0.2 | 0.2 |
| 162 | +1.8 | 1.8 |
| 163 | +2.8 | 2.8 |
| 165 | +4.8 | 4.8 |
| 167 | +6.8 | 6.8 |
| 170 | +9.8 | 9.8 |
Sum of raw deviations ≈ 0 → use
MAD Step 3: Average the Absolute Deviations
A typical Team B player is about 5.2 cm from the team mean.
Compute Team A's MAD: Your Turn
Team A: 162, 165, 165, 168, 170, 172, 175, 178, 180, 185
| Step | Work |
|---|---|
| Mean | |
| Deviations | Complete $ |
| MAD | Sum |
Hint: sum = 60
Team A MAD: Answer Revealed
Deviations: 10, 7, 7, 4, 2, 0, 3, 6, 8, 13 → sum = 60
| Team | Mean | MAD |
|---|---|---|
| A | 172.0 cm | 6.0 cm |
| B | 160.2 cm | 5.2 cm |
Check-In: Why Absolute Value Matters
Question: If we averaged the raw deviations (without absolute value), what would we get — and why is that a problem?
Write one sentence explaining why the MAD formula requires absolute value.
A Raw Difference in Means Can Mislead
Same 10 cm gap — very different meanings:
- Spread = 2 cm → dramatic separation
- Spread = 50 cm → barely noticeable
Scale the gap by the typical spread within each group.
Solution: Divide the gap by the MAD.
Step 1: Find the Difference in Means
Team A: 172.0 cm Team B: 160.2 cm
Subtract the smaller mean from the larger — always positive. This is our numerator; we need a denominator to judge whether 11.8 cm is large or small.
Step 2: Choose a MAD as the Ruler
| Option | Result |
|---|---|
| Team A's MAD | 6.0 cm |
| Team B's MAD | 5.2 cm |
| Average | 5.6 cm |
When both MADs are close, any choice gives a similar ratio. We use the average: 5.6 cm.
Step 3: Compute the MAD-Multiple Ratio
The gap between Team A and Team B is about 2.1 times the typical spread within either team — noticeable separation, with partial overlap only near 162–170 cm.
Interpreting the Ratio: Three Zones
| Ratio | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 1 | Substantial overlap — clouds share most of the same space |
| ≈ 1 | Partial overlap — real difference, but wide shared region |
| ≈ 2 | Noticeable separation — most of one group exceeds the other |
Writing a Complete Interpretation Statement
Sentence frame:
"[Group A]'s mean is [X] greater than [Group B]'s — about [ratio] times the MAD. The separation is [adjective]."
Applied:
"Team A's mean height is 11.8 cm greater than Team B's — about 2.1 MADs. The separation is noticeable."
Check-In: Predict from the Ratio
Question: If the MAD-multiple ratio were 0.5 instead of 2.1, what would the dot plot of Team A and Team B look like?
Describe in 1-2 sentences before we discuss.
The CCSS Benchmark: Ratio ≈ 2
The Common Core standard uses this example:
"Basketball team mean is 10 cm greater than soccer team's — about twice the variability (MAD). The separation is noticeable."
At ratio ≈ 2, the dot plot shows mostly distinct groups with only thin boundary overlap.
CCSS Example: Work Backward from Ratio
Given: gap = 10 cm, ratio = 2. What is the MAD?
Each team's MAD ≈ 5 cm — typical heights vary about 5 cm from the team mean. Working backward builds flexibility with the ratio formula.
Contrasting Scenario: Study Hours with Overlap
| Group X | Group Y | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 5.0 hr | 6.1 hr |
| MAD | 1.6 hr | 1.3 hr |
Difference = 1.1 hr, Average MAD = 1.45 hr
Side-by-Side: Two Ratios, Two Dot Plots
Ratio ≈ 2.1: separation visible — clouds mostly apart.
Ratio ≈ 0.76: heavy overlap — clouds deeply interleaved.
Exit Ticket: Compute and Classify
Plant heights (cm) after 4 weeks:
| Group P | Group Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 28.0 cm | 22.0 cm |
| MAD | 3.0 cm | 3.0 cm |
- Difference in means?
- MAD-multiple ratio?
- Classify the separation.
- Write one interpretation sentence.
Exit Ticket: Answers and Classification
- Difference:
cm - Ratio:
- Noticeable separation (ratio ≈ 2)
- "Group P's mean is 6 cm greater — 2 times the MAD. The separation is noticeable: most Group P plants are taller."
Key Takeaways and Misconception Warnings
- Shared axis reveals overlap
- MAD = average
deviation from mean - Ratio = difference ÷ MAD
Watch out:
Shared values ≠ same groups — look at the bulk
MAD ≠ range; raw deviations cancel without
Ratio ~2 allows thin boundary overlap
Coming Up Next: Drawing Inferences
7.SP.B.4 — Informal Comparative Inference
You can now describe how different two distributions are.
Next lesson: use that description to make an inference — a claim about the broader populations the samples came from.
The MAD-multiple you computed today becomes the evidence for tomorrow's comparative inference.