Two Types of Symmetry for Finite Figures
Only rotations and reflections can be symmetries of finite figures:
- Rotational symmetry: rotate by
(where ) — figure maps to itself - Reflective symmetry: reflect across a line — figure maps to itself
Translation is NOT a symmetry of any finite figure — it moves the whole figure to a new location
The Identity: Every Figure's Free Symmetry
Every figure has at least one symmetry: the identity
- Identity = 0° rotation = "do nothing"
- It trivially satisfies
(every point stays put) - We include it when listing all symmetries (makes the math cleaner)
- Important: 360° rotation = 0° rotation = identity — don't count it twice
The interesting symmetries are the non-trivial ones (beyond 0°)
Quick Check: Can Translation Be a Symmetry?
True or False:
"A translation can be a symmetry of a rectangle."
Think about this before advancing — what does a translation do to a figure?
Translation Cannot Be a Figure Symmetry
A translation moves every point to a new location — the rectangle no longer overlaps itself.
✓ Translations can only be symmetries of infinite figures (like an infinite wallpaper pattern)
✓ For finite figures: only rotations and reflections can be symmetries
Rotational Symmetry: Finding All Valid Angles
A figure has rotational symmetry if a rotation by
- The center is usually the geometric center of the figure
- The order = number of rotations that work (including identity)
- To find: test which angles send each vertex to another vertex position
Regular Hexagon: Six Rotational Symmetries
- Rotate by 60°: vertex 1 → position of vertex 2, vertex 2 → vertex 3, ...
- Test 120°, 180°, 240°, 300° — all work
- 6 rotational symmetries: 0°, 60°, 120°, 180°, 240°, 300°
Rectangle: Testing Rotation Angles
- Test 90°: long sides swap with short sides — does not work ✗
- Test 180°: each vertex maps to the opposite vertex — works ✓
- 2 rotational symmetries: 0° and 180° (order 2)
Parallelogram and Trapezoid Rotational Symmetry
Parallelogram (non-rectangle):
- 180° works: opposite vertices swap — each vertex maps to the opposite position
- 90° fails: adjacent sides have unequal lengths and non-right angles
- 2 rotational symmetries: 0° and 180°
Isosceles trapezoid:
- 180° fails: the two parallel sides have different lengths — top and bottom swap incorrectly
- Only the identity works: 1 rotational symmetry (order 1)
Pattern for Regular Polygon Symmetries
For a regular
- Regular polygon has
rotational symmetries (order ) - More sides → more symmetry → smaller angular step
- Example: equilateral triangle (
): 120°, 240°, 360°=0°
Why 60° works for the hexagon:
Check-In: Find Octagon Symmetries
A regular octagon has 8 sides.
How many rotational symmetries does it have?
At what angles?
Work through the pattern before advancing. Hint:
Octagon Has Eight Rotational Symmetries
8 rotational symmetries at:
- Smallest angle:
— not a "standard" angle, but valid - Pattern: every 45° step is a symmetry
- Order 8: the octagon looks the same from 8 orientations
Reflective Symmetry: Lines That Fold Figures
A figure has reflective symmetry if reflecting across line
The fold test: fold the figure along the candidate line — do both halves match perfectly?
- Every point of
must have its reflected image also on - Dividing into congruent pieces is not sufficient — halves must be mirror images
Rectangle: Two Lines of Symmetry
- Horizontal midline: top maps to bottom — ✓ works
- Vertical midline: left maps to right — ✓ works
- Diagonal: does NOT work ✗ — critical misconception case
Rectangle has exactly 2 lines of symmetry
Why the Rectangle Diagonal Fails
Consider rectangle:
Reflect
- Reflected image of
is not - The reflected
lands outside the rectangle
Key insight: A line of symmetry must map the entire figure onto itself — not just divide it into congruent pieces.
Parallelogram: Zero Lines of Symmetry
A non-rectangular parallelogram has no lines of symmetry:
- Midlines: adjacent angles are unequal → neither midline works
- Diagonals: angles are not right angles → neither diagonal works
- Any other line: unequal adjacent angles always prevent a match
0 lines of symmetry — even though it has 180° rotational symmetry
This proves rotational and reflective symmetry are independent
Trapezoid: One or Zero Lines of Symmetry
Isosceles trapezoid:
- Perpendicular bisector of the bases is a line of symmetry ✓
- No other line works — only that one midline balances the equal legs
- 1 line of symmetry
General (non-isosceles) trapezoid:
- The two legs have different lengths → no fold line balances them
- 0 lines of symmetry — no symmetry of any kind (except identity)
Regular Hexagon: Six Lines of Symmetry
- 3 lines through opposite vertex pairs
- 3 lines through midpoints of opposite sides
- 6 lines of symmetry total — matching the 6 rotational symmetries
Check-In: Find Pentagon Symmetry Lines
A regular pentagon has 5 sides.
How many lines of symmetry does it have?
Describe each one.
Think about where the fold lines must go — through vertices, or through midpoints?
Pentagon Has Five Lines of Symmetry
5 lines of symmetry — one per vertex:
- Each line passes through one vertex and the midpoint of the opposite side
- No "opposite vertex pairs" since 5 is odd — no two vertices are directly across
- Regular
-gon always has exactly lines — matching the rotational symmetries
Complete Symmetry Profiles for All Figures
| Figure | Rotational | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| Regular |
||
| Rectangle (non-sq.) | 2 | 2 |
| Parallelogram | 2 | 0 |
| Isosceles trapezoid | 1 | 1 |
| General trapezoid | 1 | 0 |
Key Patterns That Determine Symmetry Count
More equal sides and angles → more symmetries:
- Square (4 equal sides, 4 equal angles) → 4 + 4
- Rectangle (2 pairs equal sides, 4 equal angles) → 2 + 2
- Parallelogram (2 pairs equal sides, 2 pairs equal angles) → 2 + 0
The two symmetry types are independent:
- Parallelogram: 2 rotational, 0 reflective → rotation without reflection
- Isosceles trapezoid: 0 non-trivial rotational, 1 reflective → reflection without rotation
Rotational and Reflective Symmetry Are Independent
Can a figure have lines of symmetry but no rotational symmetry?
→ Yes — the isosceles trapezoid: 1 line of symmetry, 0 non-trivial rotations
Can a figure have rotational symmetry but no lines of symmetry?
→ Yes — the non-rectangular parallelogram: 180° rotational symmetry, 0 lines
These counterexamples prove the two types are truly independent properties
Key Takeaways and Misconception Warnings
✓ A symmetry is a rigid motion
✓ Identity (0° = 360°) is always a symmetry — don't count it twice
✓ Regular
✓ Rectangle: 2 + 2 · Parallelogram: 2 rotational + 0 reflective · Isosceles trapezoid: 0 + 1
Rectangle diagonal ≠ line of symmetry — congruent triangles ≠ self-mapping
Parallelogram has 0 lines of symmetry — despite 180° rotational symmetry
Rotational and reflective symmetry are independent — one does not imply the other
Connections to Future Geometry Topics
This lesson connects to:
- HSG.CO.A.4 (next): formal definitions of rotations and reflections — made rigorous
- HSG.CO.B.7: triangle congruence — a triangle's line of symmetry proves base angles are equal
- HSG.CO.C.11: parallelogram theorems — 180° rotational symmetry explains why opposite sides and angles are equal
Symmetry is also at the heart of crystallography, molecular chemistry, and symmetry groups
Click to begin the narrated lesson
Describe transformation effects