Two Types of Symmetry for Finite Figures
Only rotations and reflections can be symmetries of finite figures:
- Rotational symmetry: rotate by
(where ) — figure maps to itself - Reflective symmetry: reflect across a line — figure maps to itself
Translation is NOT a symmetry of any finite figure — it moves the whole figure to a new location
The Identity: Every Figure's Free Symmetry
Every figure has at least one symmetry: the identity
- Identity = 0° rotation = "do nothing"
- It trivially satisfies
(every point stays put) - We include it when listing all symmetries (makes the math cleaner)
- Important: 360° rotation = 0° rotation = identity — don't count it twice
The interesting symmetries are the non-trivial ones (beyond 0°)
Quick Check: Can Translation Be a Symmetry?
True or False:
"A translation can be a symmetry of a rectangle."
Think about this before advancing — what does a translation do to a figure?
Translation Cannot Be a Figure Symmetry
A translation moves every point to a new location — the rectangle no longer overlaps itself.
✓ Translations can only be symmetries of infinite figures (like an infinite wallpaper pattern)
✓ For finite figures: only rotations and reflections can be symmetries
Rotational Symmetry: Finding All Valid Angles
A figure has rotational symmetry if a rotation by
- The center is usually the geometric center of the figure
- The order = number of rotations that work (including identity)
- To find: test which angles send each vertex to another vertex position
Regular Hexagon: Six Rotational Symmetries
- Rotate by 60°: vertex 1 → position of vertex 2, vertex 2 → vertex 3, ...
- Test 120°, 180°, 240°, 300° — all work
- 6 rotational symmetries: 0°, 60°, 120°, 180°, 240°, 300°
Rectangle: Testing Rotation Angles
- Test 90°: long sides swap with short sides — does not work ✗
- Test 180°: each vertex maps to the opposite vertex — works ✓
- 2 rotational symmetries: 0° and 180° (order 2)
Parallelogram and Trapezoid Rotational Symmetry
Parallelogram (non-rectangle):
- 180° works: opposite vertices swap — each vertex maps to the opposite position
- 90° fails: adjacent sides have unequal lengths and non-right angles
- 2 rotational symmetries: 0° and 180°
Isosceles trapezoid:
- 180° fails: the two parallel sides have different lengths — top and bottom swap incorrectly
- Only the identity works: 1 rotational symmetry (order 1)
Pattern for Regular Polygon Symmetries
For a regular
- Regular polygon has
rotational symmetries (order ) - More sides → more symmetry → smaller angular step
- Example: equilateral triangle (
): 120°, 240°, 360°=0°
Why 60° works for the hexagon:
Check-In: Find Octagon Symmetries
A regular octagon has 8 sides.
How many rotational symmetries does it have?
At what angles?
Work through the pattern before advancing. Hint:
Octagon Has Eight Rotational Symmetries
8 rotational symmetries at:
- Smallest angle:
— not a "standard" angle, but valid - Pattern: every 45° step is a symmetry
- Order 8: the octagon looks the same from 8 orientations
Reflective Symmetry: Lines That Fold Figures
A figure has reflective symmetry if reflecting across line
The fold test: fold the figure along the candidate line — do both halves match perfectly?
- Every point of
must have its reflected image also on - Dividing into congruent pieces is not sufficient — halves must be mirror images
Rectangle: Two Lines of Symmetry
- Horizontal midline: top maps to bottom — ✓ works
- Vertical midline: left maps to right — ✓ works
- Diagonal: does NOT work ✗ — critical misconception case
Rectangle has exactly 2 lines of symmetry
Why the Rectangle Diagonal Fails
Consider rectangle:
Reflect
- Reflected image of
is not - The reflected
lands outside the rectangle
Key insight: A line of symmetry must map the entire figure onto itself — not just divide it into congruent pieces.
Parallelogram: Zero Lines of Symmetry
A non-rectangular parallelogram has no lines of symmetry:
- Midlines: adjacent angles are unequal → neither midline works
- Diagonals: angles are not right angles → neither diagonal works
- Any other line: unequal adjacent angles always prevent a match
0 lines of symmetry — even though it has 180° rotational symmetry
This proves rotational and reflective symmetry are independent
Trapezoid: One or Zero Lines of Symmetry
Isosceles trapezoid:
- Perpendicular bisector of the bases is a line of symmetry ✓
- No other line works — only that one midline balances the equal legs
- 1 line of symmetry
General (non-isosceles) trapezoid:
- The two legs have different lengths → no fold line balances them
- 0 lines of symmetry — no symmetry of any kind (except identity)
Regular Hexagon: Six Lines of Symmetry
- 3 lines through opposite vertex pairs
- 3 lines through midpoints of opposite sides
- 6 lines of symmetry total — matching the 6 rotational symmetries
Check-In: Find Pentagon Symmetry Lines
A regular pentagon has 5 sides.
How many lines of symmetry does it have?
Describe each one.
Think about where the fold lines must go — through vertices, or through midpoints?
Pentagon Has Five Lines of Symmetry
5 lines of symmetry — one per vertex:
- Each line passes through one vertex and the midpoint of the opposite side
- No "opposite vertex pairs" since 5 is odd — no two vertices are directly across
- Regular
-gon always has exactly lines — matching the rotational symmetries
Complete Symmetry Profiles for All Figures
| Figure | Rotational | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| Regular |
||
| Rectangle (non-sq.) | 2 | 2 |
| Parallelogram | 2 | 0 |
| Isosceles trapezoid | 1 | 1 |
| General trapezoid | 1 | 0 |
Key Patterns That Determine Symmetry Count
More equal sides and angles → more symmetries:
- Square (4 equal sides, 4 equal angles) → 4 + 4
- Rectangle (2 pairs equal sides, 4 equal angles) → 2 + 2
- Parallelogram (2 pairs equal sides, 2 pairs equal angles) → 2 + 0
The two symmetry types are independent:
- Parallelogram: 2 rotational, 0 reflective → rotation without reflection
- Isosceles trapezoid: 0 non-trivial rotational, 1 reflective → reflection without rotation
Rotational and Reflective Symmetry Are Independent
Can a figure have lines of symmetry but no rotational symmetry?
→ Yes — the isosceles trapezoid: 1 line of symmetry, 0 non-trivial rotations
Can a figure have rotational symmetry but no lines of symmetry?
→ Yes — the non-rectangular parallelogram: 180° rotational symmetry, 0 lines
These counterexamples prove the two types are truly independent properties
Key Takeaways and Misconception Warnings
✓ A symmetry is a rigid motion
✓ Identity (0° = 360°) is always a symmetry — don't count it twice
✓ Regular
✓ Rectangle: 2 + 2 · Parallelogram: 2 rotational + 0 reflective · Isosceles trapezoid: 0 + 1
Rectangle diagonal ≠ line of symmetry — congruent triangles ≠ self-mapping
Parallelogram has 0 lines of symmetry — despite 180° rotational symmetry
Rotational and reflective symmetry are independent — one does not imply the other
Connections to Future Geometry Topics
This lesson connects to:
- HSG.CO.A.4 (next): formal definitions of rotations and reflections — made rigorous
- HSG.CO.B.7: triangle congruence — a triangle's line of symmetry proves base angles are equal
- HSG.CO.C.11: parallelogram theorems — 180° rotational symmetry explains why opposite sides and angles are equal
Symmetry is also at the heart of crystallography, molecular chemistry, and symmetry groups