Exercises: Triangle Congruence Criteria from Rigid Motions
Work through each section in order. For explanation problems, use complete sentences and reference rigid motions where relevant.
Warm-Up: Review What You Know
These problems review prerequisite skills from CO.B.6, CO.B.7, and Grade 8 geometry.
According to the definition from HSG.CO.B.7, two triangles are congruent if and only if:
CPCTC stands for "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent." In a geometric proof, CPCTC is used:
In triangle , and . What is the measure of ?
Fluency Practice
Two triangles have the following known congruent parts: , , and . The angle is between sides and . Which criterion guarantees the triangles are congruent?
In the SAS rigid-motion proof, after translating vertex to vertex and rotating so that maps to , what forces vertex to land exactly on vertex ?
In the ASA proof, after aligning side onto (so and ), why is vertex uniquely determined as ?
In and , you know , , and . This is AAS (two angles and a non-included side). Which statement correctly explains why these triangles must be congruent?
In the SSS rigid-motion proof for (with , , ), after translating to and rotating so maps to , vertex must satisfy and . Why does this guarantee that is either or the reflection of over line ?
Mixed Practice
A student marks the following parts in two triangles as congruent: side , side , and . The angle is opposite side and the angle is opposite side . Which statement is correct?
In and , you know , , and .
The side is ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ the two given angles (it connects them), so this configuration is called ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ ̲ .
Which of the following correctly explains why AAS (two angles and a non-included side) is a valid congruence criterion, but SSA (two sides and a non-included angle) is not?
Two triangles each have sides of length 5, 7, and 9. Which statement correctly applies the SSS criterion?
Explain in your own words why the SAS criterion requires the angle to be the included angle (between the two given sides). What goes wrong if the angle is not included (SSA)?
Word Problems
In the figure, point is the midpoint of both and . This means and .
Name the congruence criterion that proves , and list the three pairs of congruent parts that justify it.
Using the congruence from part (a) and CPCTC, what can you conclude about and ?
A surveyor needs to find the distance across a river from point on one bank to point on the opposite bank. She marks a point on her side of the river such that . She then walks along the bank to point so that is the midpoint of . Finally, she walks inland to point on the opposite bank so that , , and are collinear, , and , , , are configured so that . Identify which congruence criterion proves and name the pair of sides that tells her the river width .
In isosceles triangle , . Let be the midpoint of . Draw segment . Use SSS to prove that , and then use CPCTC to explain why is the perpendicular bisector of .
Error Analysis
A student wrote the following proof:
Given: In and : , , ( is opposite side and is opposite side ).
Student's conclusion: "I have two sides and an angle equal in both triangles, so by SAS, ."
The student's conclusion is incorrect. Which statement best identifies and explains the error?
A student wrote:
"Triangle has angles , , . Triangle also has angles , , . All three pairs of corresponding angles are equal, so by AAA, ."
What is the fundamental error in the student's reasoning?
Challenge
The Hypotenuse-Leg (HL) criterion states: if two right triangles have equal hypotenuses and one pair of equal legs, then they are congruent. Explain why HL is valid by showing it reduces to SSS. (Hint: use the Pythagorean theorem to find the third side.)
Construct a specific numerical counterexample that proves SSA is not a valid congruence criterion. Your counterexample must: (1) specify two triangles with the same SSA data, (2) show the triangles are not congruent by computing all their side lengths and angles, and (3) explain in rigid-motion terms why no rigid motion maps one to the other.