The Diagonal Splits Into Two Triangles
divides into and ; (reflexive)
Since
Since
Alternate Interior Angles on Diagonal AC
- Teal angles:
(from ) - Red angles:
(from ) - Shared side:
(reflexive)
ASA Proof: Opposite Sides Congruent
Given:
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| Given | |
| Definition of parallelogram | |
| Alternate interior angles ( |
|
| Alternate interior angles ( |
|
| Reflexive property | |
| ASA | |
| CPCTC |
Result: Opposite Sides Are Congruent
- The diagonal divides the parallelogram into two congruent triangles
- This result becomes a building block for every subsequent proof
Strategy: One diagonal → two triangles → alternate interior angles → ASA → CPCTC
Check: Apply the Opposite Sides Theorem
In parallelogram
Name the theorem before computing, then find the values.
Answer: Opposite Sides Are Congruent
By the Opposite Sides Theorem: opposite sides are congruent.
- No calculation needed — the theorem applies directly
- Knowing two adjacent sides tells you all four sides
Proving Opposite Angles Are Congruent
Approach 1 (congruent triangles):
by CPCTC
Approach 2 (co-interior angles):
Consecutive Angles in a Parallelogram Are Supplementary
| If |
Then |
|---|---|
| opposite angles congruent | |
| consecutive angles supplementary | |
| consecutive angles supplementary |
Check: Find All Four Angle Measures
In parallelogram
Use the relationship table — name each reason before writing the value.
Answer: Using Opposite and Supplementary Angles
(opposite angles congruent) and (consecutive angles supplementary)
Watch out: One pair of congruent sides alone ≠ parallelogram.
Diagonals: Setting Up the Next Proof
Now draw both diagonals of parallelogram
Observation: Measure
The diagonals appear to bisect each other. Our job: prove it.
Both Diagonals Intersecting at E
Forward direction: Given
Forward Proof: Diagonals Bisect Each Other
Given:
Prove:
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| Given | |
| Definition of parallelogram | |
| Alternate interior angles ( |
|
| Alternate interior angles ( |
|
| Opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent (proved above) | |
| ASA | |
| CPCTC |
Understanding What Bisect Means Here
: is the midpoint of diagonal : is the midpoint of diagonal
Watch out:
Converse: If Diagonals Bisect → Parallelogram
Given: Quadrilateral
Prove:
Key tool: vertical angles at
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| Given | |
| Vertical angles | |
| SAS ( |
|
| CPCTC | |
| Converse of alternate interior angles (transversal |
Converse Proof: Second Pair of Parallel Lines
Continuing from the previous slide:
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| Vertical angles | |
| SAS ( |
|
| CPCTC | |
| Converse of alternate interior angles (transversal |
|
| Both pairs of opposite sides are parallel (definition) |
Quick Check: Converse in Action
Quadrilateral
Is
Identify the theorem, then state the conclusion.
Answer: Diagonals Bisecting Proves Parallelogram
Yes —
By the converse: bisecting diagonals → parallelogram. ✓
Midpoint Test: Proving Parallelogram by Coordinates
Vertices:
Same midpoint → diagonals bisect each other → parallelogram ✓
Key Takeaways — Deck 1
✓ Opposite sides congruent (ASA + CPCTC)
✓ Opposite angles congruent; consecutive angles supplementary
✓ Diagonals bisect each other (forward: ASA; converse: SAS + vertical angles)
One pair of congruent sides is not enough — need both
Half-diagonals ≠ sides; each converse needs its own proof
What Comes Next: Deck 2
In Deck 2 — Rectangles and Special Parallelograms:
- Rectangles: additional property of congruent diagonals — forward (SAS) and converse (SSS)
- Classification hierarchy: rectangle, rhombus, square — which properties belong where?
- Five methods to prove a quadrilateral is a parallelogram
Click to begin the narrated lesson
Prove theorems about parallelograms